![]() Others have speculated that NSA has gained ability to crack 1024-bit RSA/DH keys. ![]() A GCHQ document warned however “These capabilities are among the SIGINT community’s most fragile, and the inadvertent disclosure of the simple ‘fact of’ could alert the adversary and result in immediate loss of the capability.” Another internal document stated that “there will be NO ‘need to know.’” Several experts, including Bruce Schneier and Christopher Soghoian, have speculated that a successful attack against RC4, a 1987 encryption algorithm still used in at least 50 per cent of all SSL/TLS traffic, is a plausible avenue, given several publicly known weaknesses of RC4. became the sole editor” of the standard.Įxperts also think successful attacks have been made against RC4, and that the NSA may be able to crack 1024-bit RSA keys.īy 2010, the NSA had developed “groundbreaking capabilities” against encrypted Internet traffic. Leaked NSA documents state that their effort was “a challenge in finesse” and that “Eventually, N.S.A. It was reported on Decemthat RSA had accepted a payment of $10 million from the NSA to set the random number generator as the default. While RSA Security has denied knowingly inserting a backdoor into BSAFE, it has not yet given an explanation for the continued usage of Dual_EC_DRBG after its flaws became apparent in 20. Even though this random number generator was known to be insecure and slow soon after the standard was published, and a potential NSA backdoor was found in 2007 while alternative random number generators without these flaws were certified and widely available, RSA Security continued using Dual_EC_DRBG in the company's BSAFE toolkit and Data Protection Manager until September 2013. The New York Times has reported that the random number generator Dual_EC_DRBG contains a back door from the NSA, which would allow the NSA to break encryption keys generated by the random number generator. Out of interest, why do we trust RSA either? See below - they have some explaining to do: ![]() The authors of one NSA presentation boast of a project called FOURSCORE that stores information including decrypted PPTP VPN metadata. Experts have considered PPTP insecure for some time now, but it is still in use in many commercial systems. Both seem to pose few problems for the NSA spies if they really want to crack a connection. The most widely used ones are called Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP) and Internet Protocol Security (Ipsec). VPN connections can be based on a number of different protocols. In other words, by the end of 2011, the NSA's plans called for simultaneously surveilling 20,000 supposedly secure VPN communications per hour. The aim was for the system to be able to completely process "at least 20 percent" of these requests, meaning the data traffic would have to be decrypted and reinjected. This number was expected to increase to 100,000 per hour by the end of 2011. The only change I've seen in all the attempts is that originally it wouldn't let me enter the pass code it asked for connection to Itunes (when i connected to iTunes it said unlock first !! lol) but now it allows the keying of a pass code.According to an NSA document dating from late 2009, the agency was processing 1,000 requests an hour to decrypt VPN connections. ![]() Ive tried the second tab (Bypass iPhone is disabled) and it runs through completely but makes no difference. Ive tried to be as descriptive as possible ! The issue is that on the ipod 3G it comes up and asks for a passscode and "seems" not to be able to reboot again if that makes sense ? I put the phone into DFU and redsn0w does its wonders until it reboots the first time (says exploiting with limera1n) but then stops. My issue is that it I enter everything in the lock screen password tab (ipsw etc) I have worked through various issues - 64 bit, JRE version, Net, root directory etc I apologise if I have missed this but I have honestly read the full thread from start to finish three times as a guest and have now joined the forum so I can join in and ask about my issue.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |